From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Mennella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

October 23, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.


In an action for conversion of part of an engine obtained from a burned and wrecked boat owned by Mennella, it appears that one Smith took the engine from the submerged, or partially submerged, wreck about six weeks after the boat was wrecked, on the theory that the part of the engine taken had been abandoned by the owner. The part of the engine so obtained was given by Smith to the plaintiff, his sister. It was then repaired, new parts added, and placed in her boat in use, from which it was taken later by the defendants without any legal process. The principal question of fact was whether the wreck and the engine had been abandoned by the owner. The verdict was for the plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Mennella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Williamson v. Mennella

Case Details

Full title:HELEN WILLIAMSON, Respondent, v. VITO MENNELLA, Defendant, and LINDSAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Columbus-America Dis. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co.

Nunley v. M/V DAUNTLESS COLOCOTRONIS, 863 F.2d 1190, 1198 (5th Cir. 1989); see also Bunge Corp. v. Agri-Trans…

Bruton, Attorney General v. Enterprises, Inc.

Defendants also assign as error the court's conclusion of law that the State of North Carolina has never…