From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 28, 1963
317 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 17349.

Argued March 20, 1963.

Decided March 28, 1963.

Mr. Leonard S. Melrod, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. E. David Harrison, Washington, D.C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Gerald A. Messerman, Asst. U.S. Atty. with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before DANAHER, BURGER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


Appellant seeks review of conviction on one count of rape and one of rape and robbery which were joined in one indictment and tried together after denial of motion for severance. The two offenses occurred within a period of 12 days and at precisely the same place and under similar circumstances. Verdicts of guilty were returned but the death sentence was not fixed by the jury. Sentences of one to three years on the robbery count, and 10 to 30 years on each of the rape counts were imposed, to run concurrently.

Court appointed counsel has diligently briefed and ably argued this case but our examination of the record and authorities in light of his contentions discloses no error which would warrant disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 28, 1963
317 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Williams v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Bernard E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 1963

Citations

317 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
115 U.S. App. D.C. 134

Citing Cases

STATE v. CANN

" Wright, Federal Practice Procedure, § 222, p. 437.See, United States v. Barrett, 505 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir.…

Conte v. Cardwell

Allegations of participation by the petitioner in successive prison riots in the same institution separated…