From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 9, 2014
Case No. 3:12-cv-02768 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-02768

09-09-2014

Richard Williams, Petitioner, v. Neil Turner, Respondent.


ORDER

Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, filed on June 18, 2014, recommending dismissal of Petitioner Richard Williams's action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Under the relevant statute, "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.

The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) ("only those specific objections to the magistrate's report made to the district court will be preserved for appellate review").

Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Williams's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed.

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 9, 2014
Case No. 3:12-cv-02768 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Williams v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:Richard Williams, Petitioner, v. Neil Turner, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-02768 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

Valsadi v. Sheldon

Valsadi's trial did not violate any principles of fundamental fairness. See Williams v. Turner, No.…

Sluss v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

More recently, a district court in Ohio relied on Goldberg to similarly hold that the habeas petitioner had…