From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Nov 16, 2021
1:21-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-595

11-16-2021

RUTH ANN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and CHCS SERVICES, INC. Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

Timothy S. Black United States District Judge.

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's “Notice of Partial Dismissal of Counts III and IV.” (Doc. 18). Plaintiff purports to voluntarily dismiss Counts III and IV of her Amended Complaint, (Doc. 9), under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Rule 41 permits plaintiffs to “dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (emphasis supplied). In the Sixth Circuit, plaintiffs may only use a Rule 41 notice to dismiss the entire controversy, not a portion of the claims. Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 286 F.2d 782, 785 (6th Cir. 1961). A Rule 41 notice purporting to dismiss only certain claims is therefore ineffective. See, e.g., Malik v. F-19 Holdings, LLC, No. CV 5:15-130-KKC, 2016 WL 2939150, at *4 (E.D. Ky. May 19, 2016).

Where plaintiffs seek to dismiss only some of their claims, the appropriate procedural vehicle is an amended complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15; see Barrientos v. UT-Battelle, LLC, 284 F.Supp.2d 908, 916 (S.D. Ohio 2003). For that reason, courts often, in their discretion, construe a Rule 41 notice that purports “to dispose of fewer than all claims against a defendant” as a Rule 15 motion for leave to amend. Baker v. City of Detroit, 217 Fed.Appx. 491, 497 (6th Cir. 2007).

Accordingly, the Court will construe Plaintiff's “notice” as a motion for leave to amend under Rule 15. Courts “should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2). Such is the case here.

Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. Consistent with Rule 15(a)(3), Defendants shall have 14 days to respond to the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Nov 16, 2021
1:21-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:RUTH ANN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-595 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2021)