From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Strand

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1956
239 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 15206.

November 9, 1956.

Ralph E. Hopper, Oakland, Cal., for appellant.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and HAMLIN, District Judge.


Williams appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his complaint seeking damages for his imprisonment arising from the claimed perjury of Strand in the sworn criminal complaint against Williams, claiming the complaint stated falsely that appellant had given Strand on July 6, 1953 a bad check for $153.24, feloniously and with intent to defraud Strand. The complaint was filed February 4, 1956, next after Williams' complaint in the case of Williams v. McNealy, 9 Cir., 239 F.2d 150.

As in that case, the Alaska statute, 3 A.C.L.A. § 55-2-7, limiting the period during which suit can be brought for such a tort to two years, is applicable. Williams here makes the same claim of the tolling of the statute by the provisions of 3 A.C.L.A., 1949, § 55-2-15, which statute is inapplicable for the reason stated in Williams v. McNealy, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Strand

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1956
239 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Williams v. Strand

Case Details

Full title:James A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Chester E. STRAND, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 9, 1956

Citations

239 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1956)
16 Alaska 512

Citing Cases

Williams v. Pierce County Board of Commr's

The decision of the district court is affirmed. See Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 261 F.2d 224; Williams…