From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 20, 2004
135 S.W.3d 503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83397

April 20, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Emmett M. O'Brien, Judge.

Marcellus S. Williams Potosi Correctional Center (Pro Se) Mineral Point, MO, for appellant.

Andrea Kaye Spillars, Breck K. Burgess Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary R. Russell, J.



ORDER


Marcellus S. Williams ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He seeks to vacate his convictions and sentences for robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, two counts of false imprisonment, and stealing a motor vehicle. He was sentenced as a persistent felony offender to a total term of 64 years to run consecutive to a previously imposed sentence.

Movant raises 10 points and 26 sub-points on appeal that allege that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on his direct appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination was not erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 20, 2004
135 S.W.3d 503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCELLUS S. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 20, 2004

Citations

135 S.W.3d 503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Roper

Resp. Ex. J at 107. Petitioner filed an appeal of the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion with the Missouri…