From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 5, 1918
77 So. 919 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)

Opinion

6 Div. 419.

February 5, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H.P. Heflin, Judge.

Mack Williams, alias, etc., was convicted of grand larceny under an indictment charging robbery and appeals. Affirmed.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was tried under an indictment charging him with robbery, was convicted of the offense of grand larceny, and duly sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction following the verdict of the jury. There is a certificate from the presiding judge that the time for tendering the bill of exceptions in this cause has expired, and that no bill of exceptions had been presented to him. The given and refused charges are set out in the record, but this court cannot review and pass upon said charges in the absence of the bill of exceptions and the oral charge of the court.

We find nothing in the record authorizing a reversal of the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 5, 1918
77 So. 919 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 5, 1918

Citations

77 So. 919 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
77 So. 919

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

In the absence of a bill of exceptions and the oral charge of the court, written charges refused to defendant…

Hardy v. State

The charge of the court nowhere appears in the record, and therefore this court cannot pass upon the several…