From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 26, 1985
468 So. 2d 102 (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)

Opinion

7 Div. 236.

March 26, 1985.

Walden M. Buttram of Finlayson Buttram, Gadsden, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Fred F. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


On original deliverance this court affirmed the conviction of appellant, Calvin Lynn Williams, without opinion. 453 So.2d 11. After this court denied his application for rehearing, 453 So.2d 11, he petitioned the Supreme Court of Alabama for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.

The Supreme Court of Alabama has determined that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant's conviction. Williams v. State, 468 So.2d 99 (Ala. 1985). The Supreme Court held that this court erred in affirming the judgment of the trial court, and reversed and remanded the cause to this court with directions that this court enter an order consistent with its opinion. Williams v. State, supra.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction heretofore entered by the trial court in this cause is due to be, and is hereby, reversed.

The United States Supreme Court has mandated that "the Double Jeopardy Clause precludes a second trial once a reviewing court has found the evidence legally insufficient," Burk v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 98 S.Ct. 2141, 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978), and we find we have no choice but to reverse the decision of the lower court and render judgment in the defendant's favor. Martin v. State, 461 So.2d 1340 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 461 So.2d 1343 (Ala. 1984).

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

All Judges concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 26, 1985
468 So. 2d 102 (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Calvin Lynn WILLIAMS, alias v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 26, 1985

Citations

468 So. 2d 102 (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

USA Petroleum Corp. v. Hines

USA Petroleum injected the question of negligence into the case by requesting certain jury charges; in doing…