From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
May 12, 1980
414 A.2d 254 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 1184, September Term, 1979.

Decided May 12, 1980.

SENTENCE — Revocation Of Probation — Trial Court, In Revoking Probation, Authorized To Sentence The Person To Serve "The Period Of Imprisonment Prescribed In The Original Sentence Or Any Portion Thereof" Does Not Allow For An Increase In The Original Sentence But Limits The Court To The Unexpired (Unserved) Portion Of The Original Sentence — Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol., 1979 Cum. Supp.) Art. 27, § 642. p. 597

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County (THIEME, J.).

Patrick L. Williams pled guilty to four counts of breaking and entering, a lesser included offense and was convicted thereon. He was sentenced to five years imprisonment however four years of that sentence was suspended. Defendant was found in violation of his probation and the court revoked the probation and he was committed to prison for five years. Williams appeals.

Sentence vacated; case remanded to Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County for resentencing; costs shall not be reallocated pursuant to Maryland Rule 1082 f.

The cause was submitted on briefs to MORTON, MOORE and WILNER, JJ.

Submitted by Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, and Nancy Louise Cook, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Submitted by Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General, Ray E. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Warren B. Duckett, Jr., State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County, and James Dryden, Assistant State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County, for appellee.


In May, 1975, appellant was charged with four counts of burglary. He pled guilty to four counts of breaking and entering, a lesser included offense, and was convicted thereon. On September 5, 1975, he was sentenced by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County to five years imprisonment; however, four years of that sentence were suspended in lieu of active probation.

Appellant served that one year in prison and commenced his four-year probation period on September 5, 1976. On October 5, 1979, appellant was found in violation of the conditions of his probation for reasons that are not in dispute here. The court revoked the probation and committed him to prison for five years.

This, the court had no authority to do. Md. Ann. Code art. 27, § 642 authorizes a court, in revoking probation, to sentence the person to serve "the period of imprisonment prescribed in the original sentence or any portion thereof." The statute does not permit the court to increase the original sentence, however; and, in that regard, the phrase "period of imprisonment prescribed in the original sentence" must be taken to mean the unexpired term thereof. See Costello v. State, 240 Md. 164 (1965). A person may not be compelled to serve a sentence, or part of a sentence, that he has already served, for that necessarily involves an increase in the original sentence.

In this case, the maximum period of imprisonment allowable under § 642 would have been four years.

Sentence vacated; case remanded to Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County for resentencing; costs shall not be reallocated pursuant to Maryland Rule 1082 f.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
May 12, 1980
414 A.2d 254 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK L. WILLIAMS v . STATE OF MARYLAND

Court:Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Date published: May 12, 1980

Citations

414 A.2d 254 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)
414 A.2d 254

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The nub of the distinction is the inability of the court to increase or enhance a sentence that has once and…

STATE v. RIOUX, P2/90-0669A (1999)

This Court upon revocation of a suspended sentence may not compel Rioux "to serve a sentence, or part of a…