From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1992
600 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-1841.

June 9, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Juan Ramirez, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy Ginsberg Shanock, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


Williams was convicted for selling a $10 cocaine rock within 1,000 feet of school property and sentenced to a fifteen-year term of imprisonment as a habitual offender with a three-year mandatory minimum term.

The question presented is whether the fact that the State's informant — a witness to the drug transaction — had an outstanding bench warrant for driving with a suspended license, was relevant evidence which should have been admitted as impeachment evidence. We hold that the evidence was wrongfully excluded.

Driving while a license is under suspension is a second-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to sixty days of incarceration.

Any evidence tending to establish that a witness is appearing for the State for any reason other than to tell the truth should not be kept from the jury. A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lavette v. State, 442 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 449 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1984).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1992
600 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1992

Citations

600 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Cortes v. State

Breedlove v. State, 580 So.2d 605, 608 (Fla. 1991) (emphasis supplied); Fulton v. State, 335 So.2d 280,…

Bell v. State

These two questions were extremely relevant to Charles' credibility and were the proper subject of…