From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 2, 1988
521 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 86-2211.

March 2, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Robert H. Bonanno, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


While appellant raises three issues on appeal, only the third issue has merit. The record contains no evidence that appellant intelligently and knowingly waived his right to a jury trial. There is no written waiver signed by appellant nor is there any indication that the judge asked appellant if he wished to waive his right to a jury trial. The only mention of a jury trial is contained in defense counsel's statement: "I would like to try this thing nonjury." This is not a sufficient waiver.

Under Otis v. State, 444 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) and Cirio v. State, 440 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we reverse and remand since there is no indication that appellant knowingly waived his right to a jury trial. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.260.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 2, 1988
521 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES S. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 2, 1988

Citations

521 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sansom v. State

However, a defendant's silence in court does not constitute a valid waiver of the right to a jury trial, even…