From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Feb 21, 2017
510 S.W.3d 907 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. ED 103687

02-21-2017

Jerome WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, Missouri, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent.


Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, Missouri, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jerome Williams appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Feb 21, 2017
510 S.W.3d 907 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerome WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .

Date published: Feb 21, 2017

Citations

510 S.W.3d 907 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Norman

State v. Williams, 422 S.W. 3d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013) (Resp. Exh. E). The Missouri Court of Appeals later…