From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Mar 24, 2017
452 Md. 47 (Md. 2017)

Opinion

No. 95, Sept. Term, 2016

03-24-2017

Deon Leroy WILLIAMS v. STATE of Maryland

Rachel Simmonsen, Asst. Public Defender (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), for petitioner. Todd W. Hesel, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), for respondent.


Rachel Simmonsen, Asst. Public Defender (Paul B. DeWolfe, Public Defender of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), for petitioner.

Todd W. Hesel, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), for respondent.

Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and thereafter a Motion to Reconsider and Grant Questions 3 Through 5 in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and a Motion to Dismiss and Reply to Motion to Reconsider filed thereto, it is this 24th day of March , 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Mar 24, 2017
452 Md. 47 (Md. 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Deon Leroy WILLIAMS v. STATE of Maryland

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

452 Md. 47 (Md. 2017)
156 A.3d 753

Citing Cases

Faith v. State

In reviewing a sexually invasive search, appellate courts are charged with "taking into account the relative…

Wilkerson v. State

"'Control' is defined as 'the exercise of a restraining or directing influence over the thing allegedly…