From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Slote

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1877
70 N.Y. 601 (N.Y. 1877)

Summary

In Williams v. Slote, 70 N.Y. 601, the demand for judgment was not for any specific sum, but generally, as in this case, for an accounting, and that defendants be adjudged to pay such sum as shall be found due thereon.

Summary of this case from Parker v. Pullman Co.

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1877

Decided June 12, 1877

William A. Beach, for appellant.

John S. Woodward, for respondents.



EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Slote

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1877
70 N.Y. 601 (N.Y. 1877)

In Williams v. Slote, 70 N.Y. 601, the demand for judgment was not for any specific sum, but generally, as in this case, for an accounting, and that defendants be adjudged to pay such sum as shall be found due thereon.

Summary of this case from Parker v. Pullman Co.
Case details for

Williams v. Slote

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLA W. WILLIAMS, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v . DANIEL SLOTE et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1877

Citations

70 N.Y. 601 (N.Y. 1877)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Pullman Co.

The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant company for the…

Wetmore v. Porter

Even under the former practice this complaint would have been held good in an action of trover, and the…