From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Scheingart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 20, 2015
No. C 15-3013 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2015)

Summary

rejecting habeas petitioner's argument that the state court lacked jurisdiction to convict him because he is a "sovereign citizen"

Summary of this case from Turner v. Newsom

Opinion

No. C 15-3013 MMC

11-20-2015

CHARLES LEE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ROY SCHEINGART, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero's "Report and Recommendation Regarding Sufficiency of Complaint or Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A" ("Report and Recommendation"), filed October 27, 2015. In said Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Spero recommends the Court dismiss without leave to amend plaintiff's pro se "Petition," filed June 29, 2015. In said petition, plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated, seeks release from custody, as well as monetary relief against various government officials, on the ground that the state court in which plaintiff was convicted lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff because he is a "sovereign citizen."

On November 4, 2015, plaintiff filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Spero's Report and Recommendation, on the ground that it was "not duly sworn." Plaintiff's objection is hereby overruled, as there is no case or statutory authority requiring such a judicial determination be submitted under oath.

Having reviewed de novo the matters raised in plaintiff's petition, this Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, plaintiff's petition is hereby DISMISSED without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2015

/s/_________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Scheingart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 20, 2015
No. C 15-3013 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2015)

rejecting habeas petitioner's argument that the state court lacked jurisdiction to convict him because he is a "sovereign citizen"

Summary of this case from Turner v. Newsom

dismissing habeas petition, without leave to amend, that sought release from custody, as well as monetary relief against various officials, on the ground that the state court in which plaintiff was convicted lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff because he is a "sovereign citizen."

Summary of this case from Richmond v. Cockrum
Case details for

Williams v. Scheingart

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LEE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ROY SCHEINGART, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 20, 2015

Citations

No. C 15-3013 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2015)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Newsom

Turner's argument that he is a sovereign citizen who is not subject to the laws of the State of California or…

Richson-Bey v. Palmer

; see also Liles v. Skiles, No. 2:22-cv-00004-DCN, 2022 WL 3101620 (D. Idaho Aug. 4, 2022) (dismissing as…