From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Miller-Stout

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Mar 10, 2006
No. CV-05-418-MWL (E.D. Wash. Mar. 10, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV-05-418-MWL.

March 10, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


JUDGMENT HAVING been entered against Timothy Williams in Asotin County (Washington) Superior Court on or about May 19, 2003; Mr. Williams' conviction having become final before the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); and the Ninth Circuit having decided that Blakely does not apply retroactively to a conviction that became final before that case was decided, Schardt v. Payne, 414 F.3d 1025, 1038 (9th Cir. 2005); Now, therefore

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Michael W. Leavitt correctly determined that Mr. Williams may not challenge the validity of his conviction under Blakely v. Washington, supra.

2. Mr. Williams' objections (Ct. Rec. 7) are overruled.

3. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Leavitt's report and recommendation (Ct. Rec. 6).

4. Mr. Williams' amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Ct. Rec. 5) is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to file this order, enter judgment accordingly, furnish copies of the order and judgment to Mr. Williams, and close the case.


Summaries of

Williams v. Miller-Stout

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Mar 10, 2006
No. CV-05-418-MWL (E.D. Wash. Mar. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Williams v. Miller-Stout

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Washington

Date published: Mar 10, 2006

Citations

No. CV-05-418-MWL (E.D. Wash. Mar. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Hickam v. Janecka

In Williams v. Miller-Stout, No. 2:05-CV-864-ID, 2007 WL 3147667 (M.D. Ala. November 2, 2006), the Honorable…