From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Lewis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2020
No. 20-6813 (4th Cir. Sep. 29, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6813

09-29-2020

LARRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT B. LEWIS; SUSAN M. DUFFY; FELICIA OGUNSILE; ADAM T. BRADBURN; CAPTAIN LANE; OFFICER BUTLER, Unit Counselor; WARDEN GLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Smith, LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00182-MGL) Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Smith, LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Williams appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Williams' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Williams' remaining state law claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Lewis, No. 5:19-cv-00182-MGL (D.S.C. May 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Williams v. Lewis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2020
No. 20-6813 (4th Cir. Sep. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT B. LEWIS; SUSAN M. DUFFY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 29, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6813 (4th Cir. Sep. 29, 2020)