From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Holsclaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1998
349 N.C. 225 (N.C. 1998)

Opinion

No. 28PA98

Filed 9 October 1998

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 128 N.C. App. 205, 495 S.E.2d 166 (1998), affirming in part and reversing in part orders entered 4 October 1996 and 24 October 1996, by Barnette, J., in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 30 September 1998.

Law Office of Robert E. Ruegger, by Robert E. Ruegger, for unnamed defendant-appellant Integon Indemnity Corporation.

Fuller, Becton, Slifkin Bell, by James C. Fuller and Asa L. Bell, Jr., for plaintiff-appellees.

Haywood, Denny Miller, L.L.P., by Robert E. Levin and Thomas H. Moore, on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, amicus curiae.


AFFIRMED.

Justice WYNN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Williams v. Holsclaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1998
349 N.C. 225 (N.C. 1998)
Case details for

Williams v. Holsclaw

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANTHONY WILLIAMS and KATHERINE WILLIAMS v. RONALD FLOYD HOLSCLAW…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1998

Citations

349 N.C. 225 (N.C. 1998)
504 S.E.2d 784

Citing Cases

State v. Gerberding

As should be obvious, the statutory requirement that there be proof of "malice or bad motive" in addition to…

Arrington v. Raleigh

The district court, in finding that the City had waived sovereign immunity through its purchase of two…