From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-7

In the Matter of Lewis WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Lewis Williams, Albion, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Lewis Williams, Albion, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with multiple disciplinary infractions after it was alleged that he and fellow inmates held down and slashed the face of a rival gang member in retaliation for petitioner having been assaulted a week earlier. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violent conduct, creating a disturbance, assault, possession of a weapon and gang activity. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and petitioner thereafter*305commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, documentation and testimony of the investigating officer, both at the hearing and confidentially, provide substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt ( see Matter of Torres v. Fischer, 106 A.D.3d 1342, 1343, 965 N.Y.S.2d 390 [2013];Matter of Janis v. Prack, 106 A.D.3d 1297, 1297, 964 N.Y.S.2d 775 [2013],lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 864, 973 N.Y.S.2d 87, 995 N.E.2d 1159 [2013] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed nature of the confidential information itself, as testified to by the investigating officer, permitted the Hearing Officer an ample basis to assess its reliability ( see Matter of Flanders v. Fischer, 105 A.D.3d 1238, 1239, 962 N.Y.S.2d 827 [2013];Matter of McCain v. Fischer, 104 A.D.3d 1009, 1010, 960 N.Y.S.2d 563 [2013] ). Finally, the record demonstrates that the determination of guilt resulted from the evidence presented, rather than any alleged hearing officer bias ( see Matter of Colon v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 1176, 1117, 950 N.Y.S.2d 821 [2012],lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 857, 960 N.Y.S.2d 349, 984 N.E.2d 324 [2013];Matter of Rodriguez v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d 1333, 1333, 946 N.Y.S.2d 908 [2012] ).

We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved or without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lewis WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7233
974 N.Y.S.2d 304

Citing Cases

Lopez v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Inasmuch as a loss of good time was imposed, the matter must be remitted for a redetermination of the penalty…

LaMountain v. Fischer

Turning to petitioner's procedural contentions, the detailed misbehavior report was sufficient to put him on…