From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Dickson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 9, 1968
394 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 21800.

May 9, 1968.

Elmo Williams, California Mens Colony, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Brian Amer, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

Hon. Gus J. Solomon, Chief United States District Judge, Portland, Oregon, sitting by designation.


The judgment of the district court dismissing the action before process was issued and served, without notice to the appellant of any motion to dismiss, and without any finding of frivolity or malice ( 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)), is reversed and remanded. Harmon v. Superior Court, 307 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.); Armstrong v. Rushing, 352 F.2d 836, 837 (9th Cir.). We do not pass on the merits of the action, if any.


Summaries of

Williams v. Dickson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 9, 1968
394 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Williams v. Dickson

Case Details

Full title:Elmo WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Fred DICKSON, Warden, etc., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 9, 1968

Citations

394 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Diamond v. Pitchess

We have held that a court may not summarily dismiss an in forma pauperis action without any finding of…