From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-12396 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 23, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-12396

04-23-2019

DERRICK WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TRANSFER THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL [#17] TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

On April 5, 2019, this Court summarily dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, denied the motion for an evidentiary hearing, declined to issue a certificate of appealability, and denied Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 14.

On April 16, 2019, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Dkt. No. 16. Petitioner also filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs on appeal with this Court. Dkt. No. 17. For the reasons stated below, the Court orders that the application be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

A notice of appeal generally "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal." Marrese v. Am. Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 (1985) (citing Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982) (per curiam)); Workman v. Tate, 958 F.2d 164, 167 (6th Cir. 1992). Petitioner's notice of appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction to consider his motion that he be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Johnson v. Woods, No. 5:12-11632; 2013 WL 557271, *2 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 13, 2013); Glick v. U.S. Civil Service Comm'n, 567 F. Supp. 1483, 1490 (N.D. Ill. 1983); Brinton v. Gaffney, 560 F. Supp. 28, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1983).

Because jurisdiction of this action was transferred from the district court to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upon the filing of the notice of appeal, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal would be more appropriately addressed to the Sixth Circuit. In the interests of justice, this Court can order that the application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs be transferred to the Sixth Circuit for that court's consideration. See Baker v. Perry, No. 2:12-10424; 2012 WL 6097323, *2 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 6, 2012).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court transfer petitioner's Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees and Costs on Appeal [#17] to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

SO ORDERED. Dated: April 23, 2019

s/Gershwin A. Drain

HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

United States District Court Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

April 23, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

/s/ Teresa McGovern

Case Manager


Summaries of

Williams v. Campbell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-12396 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Williams v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-12396 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 23, 2019)