From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William Iselin Co., Inc. v. Milton Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1983
92 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

February 15, 1983


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ryp, J.), entered June 22, 1982, granting defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations contained in bills of lading, reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to dismiss is denied. This is an action brought by the assignee of a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of wearing apparel seeking damages for an alleged conversion of shipped goods by the defendant, a carrier engaged in the carrying of goods. The bills of lading issued in connection with the shipments provided that any action for damages arising out of nondelivery must be instituted within 12 months following the accrual of the claim. In the order appealed from, Special Term granted defendant's motion to dismiss on the ground that the instant motion was not commenced within the time prescribed by the bills of lading. The issue seems to us essentially indistinguishable from that presented in Continental Metals Corp. v. Municipal Warehouse Co. ( 92 A.D.2d 477, affg 112 Misc.2d 923). In that case, a majority of this court held with regard to a warehouse, that a similar limitation in a warehouse receipt was legally ineffective to bar an action for damages for conversion instituted against the warehouse.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Sandler, Carro and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

William Iselin Co., Inc. v. Milton Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1983
92 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

William Iselin Co., Inc. v. Milton Feinberg

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ISELIN CO., INC., Appellant, v. MILTON FEINBERG, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1983

Citations

92 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

RGA INDUS. v. JOMAS EXPRESS

Other than a casual reference to the effect that the goods in question were stolen, defendant's submission…

Refrigeration Sales Co. v. Mitchell-Jackson, Inc.

None of those arguments withstands analysis. As to its first contention, Refrigeration points out the only…