From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 21, 1954
29 N.J. Super. 316 (App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1954 —

Decided January 21, 1954.

Appeal from Superior Court, Chancery Division

Before Judges JAYNE, FRANCIS and CLAPP.

Mr. Herbert J. Hannoch argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents ( Messrs. Hannoch, Lasser, Weinstein Myers, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants ( Messrs. Lum, Fairlie Foster, attorneys).


The judgment with the following modification is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Speakman whose opinion is reported at 26 N.J. Super. 477 ( Ch. Div. 1953). Our review guides us to the conclusion that the extraordinary relief granted by paragraph No. 3 of the judgment wherein the defendants, their respective officers, agents and attorneys are permanently restrained and enjoined from assigning the tenant's interest or any part thereof under the lease, and from subletting the whole or any part of the demised premises during the term of the lease, or any renewal thereof, without the written consent of the plaintiff William Berland Realty Co., or its successors and assigns, was unwarranted by the existing state of the evidence. In that respect only the judgment is reversed and in all other respects it is affirmed. No costs.


Summaries of

William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 21, 1954
29 N.J. Super. 316 (App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BERLAND REALTY CO., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, AND…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 21, 1954

Citations

29 N.J. Super. 316 (App. Div. 1954)
102 A.2d 686

Citing Cases

Village Supermarkets, Inc. v. West Orange TP

Terms are to be implied not because `they are just or reasonable, but rather for the reason that the parties…

Schultz v. Kneidl

The court's function in construing a lease is to ascertain and give effect to the mutual intention of the…