From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William Alexander Parks v. Town of Hampton Falls, N.H.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Oct 17, 2007
Civil No. 07-cv-173-PB (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2007)

Summary

holding that prisoner's allegations that affording pretrial detainees housed in the punitive unit less out-of-cell and recreation time than inmates in the general prison population failed to state a claim where there were no allegations that the difference in treatment was not based on a legitimate penological concern

Summary of this case from Gillespie v. Wall

Opinion

Civil No. 07-cv-173-PB.

October 17, 2007


ORDER


Pro se plaintiff William Alexander Parks brings this civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution (document no. 1). Named as defendants are the Town of Hampton Falls, New Hampshire ("Town of Hampton Falls"), the Rockingham County Department of Corrections ("RCDOC") and Albert J. Wright, Superintendent of the RCDOC.

The complaint is before me for preliminary review to determine whether, among other things, it states a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire Local Rule ("LR") 4.3(d)(2). For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation issued simultaneously herewith, I find that Parks has alleged Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims for false arrest against the unnamed arresting officer employed by the Town of Hampton Falls. I further find that Parks has alleged a Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claim for false imprisonment against Wright. I recommend dismissal of all remaining claims.

With the exception of the unnamed arresting officer, Parks has filed the necessary summons form, therefore, I order the complaint to be served on the remaining defendant, Wright. The Clerk's office is directed to issue the necessary summons form and forward to the United States Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (the "U.S. Marshal's office") the summons and copies of the complaint, the report and recommendation issued simultaneously with this order, and this order. Upon receipt of the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal's office shall effect service upon the defendants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2).

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead within twenty days of service. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(A).

Parks is instructed that all future pleadings, written motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

William Alexander Parks v. Town of Hampton Falls, N.H.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Oct 17, 2007
Civil No. 07-cv-173-PB (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2007)

holding that prisoner's allegations that affording pretrial detainees housed in the punitive unit less out-of-cell and recreation time than inmates in the general prison population failed to state a claim where there were no allegations that the difference in treatment was not based on a legitimate penological concern

Summary of this case from Gillespie v. Wall
Case details for

William Alexander Parks v. Town of Hampton Falls, N.H.

Case Details

Full title:William Alexander Parks v. Town of Hampton Falls, New Hampshire, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Oct 17, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-cv-173-PB (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2007)

Citing Cases

Gillespie v. Wall

Further, it is clear that stricter restrictions on phone, visitation and recreation privileges of inmates in…