From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkins v. Shannon Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 1923
82 Pa. Super. 128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1923)

Opinion

October 22, 1923.

November 19, 1923.

Workmen's Compensation Law — Injury not on premises of employer — Injury not in course of employment.

An employee, who was injured in an accident, on his way to work and on premises not owned or controlled by his employer, is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law. Shickley v. P. R.C. I. Co., 274 Pa. 360, followed.

Appeal, No. 240, Oct. T., 1922, by plaintiff, from judgment of C.P. Huntingdon Co., May T., 1922, No. 18, reversing award of Workman's Compensation Board in the case of Charles L. Wilkins, Claimant v. Shannon Coal Company, Defendant, and Pennsylvania Bituminous Mutual Association, Insurance Carrier.

Before ORLADY, P.J., PORTER, HENDERSON, TREXLER, KELLER, LINN, and GAWTHROP, JJ. Affirmed.

Appeal from award of Workmen's Compensation Board. Before BAILEY, P.J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

The court below reversed the award of the Workmen's Compensation Board. Plaintiff appealed.

Error assigned was the entering of the decree reversing the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board.

Harry W. Petriken, for appellant.

Chester D. Fetterhoof, for appellee.


Argued October 22, 1923.


This is an appeal from judgment reversing the compensation board in granting compensation. The facts are simple. Appellant, a miner, on the way to the mines where he was employed, had to cross a railway track about two hundred yards from the mine. Some miners used a public road crossing; others, a frequently used path over the tracks. While crossing on this path, appellant stumbled and was injured; he testified "I caught on the ties or rail; whether I caught on the top end of the tie or caught my toe, either one caught." The railroad belonged not to appellant's employer but to the H. B.T.R.R. Co. The court below held, that as appellant was injured off his employer's premises, and not in the course of his employment, he was not entitled to compensation; we must agree, on the authority of Shickley v. P. R.C. I. Co. 274: Pa. 360, 362.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Wilkins v. Shannon Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 19, 1923
82 Pa. Super. 128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1923)
Case details for

Wilkins v. Shannon Coal Co.

Case Details

Full title:Charles L. Wilkins, Appellant, v. Shannon Coal Company, Defendant, and…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 19, 1923

Citations

82 Pa. Super. 128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1923)

Citing Cases

Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's College

The case is governed by the familiar principle that an employe who is injured on his way to work, and before…

Campagna v. Ziskind

The contract of employment in this case being verbal, its interpretation was for the jury, as was also the…