From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkins v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-203J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-203J.

August 14, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2008, after the Plaintiff, Glue Wilkins, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the parties until August 11, 2008 to file written objections thereto, and objections to the the report and recommendation having been filed by plaintiff which are without merit, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. [31] is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Wilkins v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-203J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Wilkins v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:GLUE WILKINS, Plaintiff v. GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent; JEFFREY A. BEARD…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 14, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-203J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lyons v. Beard

However, the Court notes its agreement with Huber's observation that a failure to adhere to state policy does…

Hammond v. Krak

Bruszewski v. United States, 181 F.2d 419, 422 (3d Cir. 1950). See also Wilkins v. Rozum, 2008 WL 3833418, at…