From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 15, 2002
64 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Nos. ED 79566, ED 79671

January 15, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Bernhardt C. Drumm, Jr., Judge.

Larry Wilkes, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J.



ORDER


Movant, Larry Wilkes, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wilkes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 15, 2002
64 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Wilkes v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WILKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 15, 2002

Citations

64 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Wilkes v. Luebbers

(Resp. Exh. J; State v. Wilkes, 64 S.W.3d 880 (Mo.Ct.App. 2002)). Petitioner pursued no other action in state…