From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Clark

U.S.
May 21, 1984
467 U.S. 1210 (1984)

Summary

holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying discovery where "the pleadings contained no allegations of specific facts that could establish the requisite contacts with the District"

Summary of this case from Dickson v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 83-1455.

May 21, 1984.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE and JUSTICE Blackmum took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions, Reported below: 919 F.2d 207. 919 F.2d 207.


Summaries of

Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Clark

U.S.
May 21, 1984
467 U.S. 1210 (1984)

holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying discovery where "the pleadings contained no allegations of specific facts that could establish the requisite contacts with the District"

Summary of this case from Dickson v. U.S.
Case details for

Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:WILK ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSN. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 21, 1984

Citations

467 U.S. 1210 (1984)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Adkinson

The Eleventh Circuit has therefore held that, under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal district courts may…

State v. Reuscher

While appellant is correct in noting that his age and alleged lesser participation in the crime could be…