From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilhelmi v. American Ry. Ex. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 198 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided May 20, 1929.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 674.

For the appellant, Harley, Cox Walburg.

For the respondent, Samuel Tartalsky.


This was an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court on certiorari affirming the order of the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas awarding compensation to the petitioner under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation act.


The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, WHITE, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 6.


Summaries of

Wilhelmi v. American Ry. Ex. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 198 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Wilhelmi v. American Ry. Ex. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HENRIETTA WILHELMI, RESPONDENT, v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

Citations

146 A. 198 (N.J. 1929)
146 A. 198

Citing Cases

Helminsky v. Ford Motor Co.

" On this point the petitioner relies upon the case of Wilhelmi v. American Railway Express Company, 6 N.J.…

Moore v. Atlanta Transit System

There are a number of cases which present factual situations similar to that found in Flemming v. St.…