From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 17, 1990
785 S.W.2d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 56617.

January 23, 1990. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1990. Application to Transfer Denied April 17, 1990.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Cheryl Rafert, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER


Movant appeals the denial of his second Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Movant has not sufficiently established why the grounds supporting his current motion could not have been included in his first pro se motion. Rule 27.26(d). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wiles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 17, 1990
785 S.W.2d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Wiles v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WILES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 17, 1990

Citations

785 S.W.2d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Wiles v. Jones

See Graham v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1533, 1540 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 842, 105 S.Ct. 148, 83 L.Ed.2d 86…