From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilcox v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 25, 2014
Case No. 8:13-cv-2378-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 8:13-cv-2378-T-33MAP

11-25-2014

HARVEY WILCOX, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Doc. # 24), entered on November 7, 2014, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed and that the case be dismissed. As of this date, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. After careful consideration, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Hous. v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of Mark A. Pizzo, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 24) is ADOPTED. (2) The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying benefits is AFFIRMED. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment in favor of the Commissioner reflecting that the Commissioner's decision denying benefits is affirmed. Thereafter, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THE CASE.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 25th day of November, 2014.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Wilcox v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 25, 2014
Case No. 8:13-cv-2378-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Wilcox v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY WILCOX, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

Case No. 8:13-cv-2378-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2014)

Citing Cases

Rios v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Moreover, as discussed below, the ALJ properly discounted the Claimant's subjective testimony, and without…