From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wieck v. Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced an action to compel the defendant to remove all fencing on his property. The plaintiff was directed to personally serve an order to show cause upon the defendant, along with a copy of his previously filed summons and complaint, on or before August 21, 1997. The defendant neither appeared on the return date of the motion nor timely interposed an answer to the complaint. On November 3, 1997, the court granted the motion upon the defendant's default.

The defendant moved to vacate the default arguing, inter alia, that he was not served with the motion papers in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause. However, the process server's affidavits constituted prima facie evidence of proper service on August 21, 1997, pursuant to CPLR 308 (1), and the defendant's allegations were insufficient to refute the contents of these affidavits ( see, Green Point Sav. Bank v. Clark, 253 A.D.2d 410; Remington Invs. v. Seiden, 240 A.D.2d 647; Sando Realty Corp. v. Aris, 209 A.D.2d 682).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Thompson and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wieck v. Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Wieck v. Halpern

Case Details

Full title:INGEBORG WIECK, Respondent, v. SIDNEY HALPERN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

Portfolio v. Reisman

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant's pro se…

Wieck v. Halpern

Further, in light of, inter alia, the purported amendment, the Supreme Court providently exercised its…