From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Widgren v. 313 East 9th Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2002
295 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1314N

June 6, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about May 12, 2000, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff fell on defendant's premises, denied defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

PAUL GREENFIELD, for Plaintiff-respondent.

ZENON B. MASNYJ, for Defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin, Wallach, JJ.


Insofar as the motion was brought pursuant to CPLR 5015, it was properly denied for failure to show a reasonable excuse for the default. Assuming that defendant never received the process that plaintiff served on the Secretary of State, such "excuse would not suffice since defendant had the obligation to keep the Secretary of State advised of [its] current and correct address", and "[t]he failure of a corporate defendant to receive service of process due to breach of the obligation to keep a current address on file with the Secretary of State (see, Business Corporation Law § 306) does not constitute a reasonable excuse" (Crespo v. A.D.A. Mgt., 292 A.D.2d 5, 9-10, 739 N.Y.S.2d 49, 52-53, citing Lawrence v. Esplanade Gardens, 213 A.D.2d 216). Moreover, defendant's conclusory assertions that it would probably have been able to raise various issues of contributory negligence and that there was nothing about the stairs on which plaintiff fell that could have contributed to the fall do not suffice to show a meritorious defense (see, Zapater v. 2540 Assocs., 250 A.D.2d 508). Thus, insofar as the order was brought pursuant to CPLR 317, it too was properly denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Widgren v. 313 East 9th Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2002
295 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Widgren v. 313 East 9th Assoc

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE WIDGREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. 313 EAST 9TH ASSOCIATES, LTD.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

W H Imports, Inc. v. Next Level Floral Design, Inc.

Here, the defendants failed to establish grounds warranting relief under CPLR 5015(a)(1). Under the…

Top Notch Drywall Corp. v. All Mine of Orange, Inc.

While there is no per se rule under CPLR 5015 which precludes a corporation from establishing, as its…