From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wickner v. McComb

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 23, 2010
Civil No. 09-1220 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1220 (DWF/JJK).

August 23, 2010

Lance Phillip Wickner, Pro Se, Plaintiff.

Jackson Evans, Esq., and Margaret E. Jacot, Assistant Attorney General, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, counsel for Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Lance Phillip Wickner's ("Plaintiff") objections to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's Report and Recommendation dated July 27, 2010, insofar as it recommends that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel be denied; (3) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied; and (4) this action be dismissed with prejudice. Defendants Mary McComb, Mike Green, William Braun, and Natalie Leseman filed a Response to Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 46) on August 20, 2010.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b). The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference for purposes of Plaintiff's objections.

Based upon the de novo review of the record and all of the arguments and submissions of the parties and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby enters the following:

ORDER

1. Plaintiff Lance Phillip Wickner's objections (Doc. No. [45]) to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's Report and Recommendation dated July 27, 2010, are DENIED.

2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's Judge Report and Recommendation dated July 27, 2010 (Doc. No. [44]), is ADOPTED.

3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [22]), is GRANTED.

4. Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. [30]), is DENIED.

5. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [31]) is DENIED.

6. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Wickner v. McComb

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 23, 2010
Civil No. 09-1220 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Wickner v. McComb

Case Details

Full title:Lance Phillip Wickner, Plaintiff, v. Mary McComb, Mike Green, William…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 23, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-1220 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hodges v. Minnesota Dep't of Corrs.

(internal quotations omitted); see also Wickner v. McComb, No. CIV. 09-1220 (DWF/JJK), 2010 WL 3385079, at…

Azukas v. Arnone

Because plaintiff was given notice of the rejection of the books and a reasonable opportunity to protest, his…