Whitworth v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.

Full title: LESLIE M. WHITWORTH, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., RUSS…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 5, 2009

Civil Case No. 08-968-PK (D. Or. Mar. 5, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 08-968-PK.

March 5, 2009

E. Clarke Balcom, Anthony J. Bonucci, Clarke Balcom, PC, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey I. Hasson, Davenport Hasson, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Defendants.

ORDER

GARR KING, District JudgePage 2

The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 17, 2009. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#23).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#7) is denied.