From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitton v. Mortimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 3, 2016
Case No. 2:15-cv-01399-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 3, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-01399-APG-PAL

06-03-2016

CHRISTOPHER TODD WHITTON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MORTIMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 10, 19, 22, 23)

On April 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge Leen entered a Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 19) recommending that plaintiff Christopher Todd Whitton's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 10) be denied. Magistrate Judge Leen also recommended that Whitton's claims seeking injunctive or declaratory relief be dismissed and that his claims seeking money damages be stayed pending resolution of the criminal charges against him.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), any objection to Judge Leen's Report & Recommendation had to be filed within fourteen days. No objection was filed. The failure to file objections within the specified time, and failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues, waives the right to appeal the order and to appeal factual issues from the order. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); LR IB 3-2(b) (stating the "district judge must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the specified findings or recommendations to which objections have been made"). There being no objection to Judge Leen's Report & Recommendation,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Leen's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is accepted and plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the declaratory and injunctive relief claims in the complaint (ECF No. 1-1) are DISMISSED, and the claims for money damages are STAYED pending resolution of the criminal charges against the plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a motion to reopen this case within 30 days of the final disposition of his criminal case if he wishes to proceed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to withdraw (ECF No. 23) his motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED.

Dated: June 3, 2016.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Whitton v. Mortimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 3, 2016
Case No. 2:15-cv-01399-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Whitton v. Mortimer

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER TODD WHITTON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MORTIMER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 3, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-01399-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Jun. 3, 2016)