From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. Railroad Company

U.S.
Jan 1, 1880
103 U.S. 770 (1880)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1880.

The act of March 3, 1875, c. 137 (18 Stat., pt. 3, p. 470), did not change the jurisdiction of this court to review the final judgment or decree of the Circuit Court.

Mr. Amos Steck for the appellants.

Mr. Bela M. Hughes, contra.


APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.


Although the act of March 3, 1875, c. 137 (18 Stat., pt. 3, p. 470), gave the circuit courts of the United States original cognizance of suits of a civil nature arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs, the sum or value of $500, it did not change our jurisdiction for the review of the judgments and decrees of those courts. That depends now, as it did before, on the value of the matter in dispute, which must exceed $5,000. This record does not show in express terms or by fair implication that the value of the property in controversy reaches that sum.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. Railroad Company

U.S.
Jan 1, 1880
103 U.S. 770 (1880)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:WHITSITT v . RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1880

Citations

103 U.S. 770 (1880)

Citing Cases

Whitsitt v. Union Depot

This was a suit in equity begun by Richard E. Whitsitt, then in life, and James Meskew, to quiet their…