From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1914
81 S.E. 746 (N.C. 1914)

Opinion

(Filed 6 May, 1914.)

Appeal and Error — Nonsuit — Trials — Evidence — Fragmentary Appeal.

An appeal from a judgment of nonsuit taken upon the ruling of the trial court upon admissibility of evidence not determinative of the controversy will not be considered. Tester v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 602, cited as controlling.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Harding, J., at November Term, 1913, of MECKLENBURG.

T. W. Alexander for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendant.


This is an action to have a trust declared, and to recover a lot (228) of land.

Upon an adverse ruling as to the admissibility of certain evidence, not necessarily determinative of the action, the plaintiff submitted to judgment of nonsuit and appealed.


The appeal must be dismissed upon the authority of Teeter v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 602, and the cases there cited.

If parties were allowed to appeal whenever dissatisfied with a ruling upon evidence, the trial of the cause upon its merits could be indefinitely postponed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Hill v. Clark, 209 N.C. 358.


Summaries of

White v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1914
81 S.E. 746 (N.C. 1914)
Case details for

White v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:S.W. WHITE ET AL. v. MARY HARRIS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1914

Citations

81 S.E. 746 (N.C. 1914)
166 N.C. 227

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Even in those rare jurisdictions, of which North Carolina is one, which permit appeal from an order of…

Hill v. Clark

The ruling of the court did not go to the heart of the matter and did not take the case from the jury, but…