From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WHITE v. BERNARDSVILLE BOR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jan 27, 1987
9 N.J. Tax 122 (Tax 1987)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1987.

Decided January 27, 1987.

J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for appellant.

Roberta Abramson argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges PRESSLER, GAULKIN and BAIME.


The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Andrew in his thorough and detailed reported opinion issued on June 6, 1986, at 9 N.J. Tax 110 (Tax Ct. 1986). We are entirely satisfied from our reading of the record that Judge Andrew's findings of fact are amply supported by "adequate, substantial and credible evidence." Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474 , 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974). See also State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 , 161-162, 199 A.2d 809 (1964). We are also in complete accord with the judge's determination that Clearview Estates, Inc. v. Mountain Lakes, 188 N.J. Super. 99 , 105, 456 A.2d 111 (App.Div. 1982) is inapposite because here farming operations constitute a permitted use under the Borough of Bernardsville's zoning ordinance. Bernardsville Code § 12-5.1(d).

Accordingly, the judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

WHITE v. BERNARDSVILLE BOR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jan 27, 1987
9 N.J. Tax 122 (Tax 1987)
Case details for

WHITE v. BERNARDSVILLE BOR

Case Details

Full title:DONALD L. WHITE AND DORIS G. WHITE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 27, 1987

Citations

9 N.J. Tax 122 (Tax 1987)

Citing Cases

Society of Holy Child v. Summit

A number of cases seemingly distinguish themselves from Cheyenne Corp. based upon the nature of the zoning…

Sinopoli v. Borough of Rumson

However, Rohallion is a horticultural farm, flowers and shrubs are the crops being raised and the lawns are…