Opinion
No. 18-16899
06-11-2019
HOWARD LEE WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROMEO ARANAS; et al., Defendants-Appellees, and ISIDRO BACA, Warden; et al., Defendants.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 3:15-cv-00573-MMD-WGC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding Before: FARRIS, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Howard Lee White, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and negligence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because White failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent or negligent to White's dietary needs. See id. at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference); see also LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1456 (9th Cir. 1993); DeBoer v. Senior Bridges of Sparks Family Hosp., 282 P.3d 727, 732 (Nev. 2012) (setting forth the elements of a traditional negligence claim under Nevada law).
White's motion to substitute party (Docket Entry No. 16) is denied.
AFFIRMED.