From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whirlpool Corp. v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 27, 1991
61 Ohio St. 3d 719 (Ohio 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-920

Submitted February 20, 1991 —

Decided August 27, 1991.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 89AP-1008.

Robert M. Anspach Associates, Robert M. Anspach and David P. Strup, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, William M. Mattes and Jeffery W. Clark, for appelle.


The judgment of the court of appeals, 1990 WL 34764, is affirmed on different grounds on the authority of Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722, decided this date. Furthermore, we order the cause dismissed for failure to state grounds upon which relief can be granted given this court's decision with respect to the constitutionality of R.C. 4121.80.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

HOLMES and WRIGHT, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Whirlpool Corp. v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 27, 1991
61 Ohio St. 3d 719 (Ohio 1991)
Case details for

Whirlpool Corp. v. Indus. Comm

Case Details

Full title:WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 27, 1991

Citations

61 Ohio St. 3d 719 (Ohio 1991)
576 N.E.2d 790

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Treasurer

Thus, it appears the Ohio Supreme Court found that Brady terminated any rights for disbursements to an…