From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whipple v. Marwell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Aug 2, 1938
1 A.2d 97 (R.I. 1938)

Opinion

August 2, 1938.

PRESENT: Moss, Baker and Condon, JJ.

Case reported in 198 A. 565.

HEARD ON MOTION for leave to reargue and motion denied.

Arthur Cushing, Edward W. Bradford, for plaintiff.

Arthur L. Conaty, for defendant.


After the filing of our former rescript in this case the defendant, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument. We have carefully considered the motion and the reasons assigned therefor. No matter which was not fully considered by the court being presented the motion is denied and dismissed.


Summaries of

Whipple v. Marwell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Aug 2, 1938
1 A.2d 97 (R.I. 1938)
Case details for

Whipple v. Marwell

Case Details

Full title:BYRON S. WHIPPLE vs. DANIEL A. MARWELL

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Aug 2, 1938

Citations

1 A.2d 97 (R.I. 1938)
61 R.I. 449

Citing Cases

Brookenick Development Co. v. Bruce

Accordingly, this Court finds that based on the available relief and historical treatment of trespass claims,…