From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeling Pitt. Steel Corp. v. Duffy

U.S.
Dec 10, 1984
469 U.S. 1087 (1984)

Summary

holding under the Bankruptcy Act that the debtor-in-possession "was given the right to avoid CVF's security interest in order to protect such third parties, not to create a windfall for [the debtor-in-possession] itself" and that "[t]o the extent that other creditors . . . are not affected adversely by the enforcement of CVF's security interest, there is no reason why such interest should not be enforced"

Summary of this case from In re Murphy

Opinion

No. 84-601.

December 10, 1984.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 738 F. 2d 1393.


Summaries of

Wheeling Pitt. Steel Corp. v. Duffy

U.S.
Dec 10, 1984
469 U.S. 1087 (1984)

holding under the Bankruptcy Act that the debtor-in-possession "was given the right to avoid CVF's security interest in order to protect such third parties, not to create a windfall for [the debtor-in-possession] itself" and that "[t]o the extent that other creditors . . . are not affected adversely by the enforcement of CVF's security interest, there is no reason why such interest should not be enforced"

Summary of this case from In re Murphy
Case details for

Wheeling Pitt. Steel Corp. v. Duffy

Case Details

Full title:WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP. v. DUFFY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 10, 1984

Citations

469 U.S. 1087 (1984)
105 S. Ct. 592

Citing Cases

Herron v. King Broadcasting

A reporter's knowledge that his principal sources were hostile to the plaintiff will not of itself establish…

Healy v. New York Life Ins. Co.

To establish a prima facie case, Healy does not have to demonstrate that he was more qualified than the…