From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheat v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Aug 22, 2011
Case No: C 11-2026 SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: C 11-2026 SBA Dkt. 22

08-22-2011

DEREK WHEAT, a current parolee, ANTONIO MARTINEZ, a current parolee, and SHANDON DAVIS, a felon currently serving a determinate sentence, on behalf ofthemselves and a class of similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

On August 18, 2011, Defendants filed a twenty-five page motion to dismiss. Dkt. 22. The page limit for non-summary judgment motions is fifteen pages. See Standing Orders ¶ C.2 (eff. July 1, 2011). Because Defendants neither sought nor obtained prior leave of Court to exceed the applicable page limits, their motion is improper and will not be considered. See Grove v. Wells Fargo Fin. Cal., Inc., 606 F.3d 577, 582 (9th Cir. 2010) (upholding district court's denial of motion to tax costs which was not in compliance with the court's local rules). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 22) is STRICKEN from the record. Defendants are granted leave to refile their motion, in a memorandum that is fifteen pages or less by no later than August 30, 2011. Plaintiffs' opposition shall be filed by no later than September 13, 2011, and Defendants' reply shall be filed by September 20, 2011. The hearing on the motion will take place on October 4, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. The Case Management Conference scheduled for September 22, 2011, is CONTINUED to October 4, 2011, and will follow the hearing on the motion. The Court, in its discretion, may decide the motion without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Local Rule 7-1(b), in which case no appearance for the motion or Case Management Conference will be necessary. No other motions in this case may be noticed for October 4, 2011. The parties are advised to check the Court's website to determine whether a court appearance is required. This Order terminates Docket 14 and 22.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wheat v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Aug 22, 2011
Case No: C 11-2026 SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Wheat v. California

Case Details

Full title:DEREK WHEAT, a current parolee, ANTONIO MARTINEZ, a current parolee, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

Case No: C 11-2026 SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)