From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whatley-Miller v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.
Feb 6, 2013
213 Cal.App.4th 544 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. B237335.

02-06-2013

SUSANNE WHATLEY-MILLER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COLLIN COOPER, Defendant and Appellant.


[Modification of opinion (212 Cal.App.4th 1298; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on January 18, 2013, be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

On page 13 [212 Cal.App.4th 1310, advance report, 2d par.], immediately following the last sentence of the second paragraph of the Disposition, and as part of that paragraph, the following language is added:

As a new rule of law, our determination will apply prospectively. (See, e.g., Harbor v. Deukmejian (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1078, 1101-1102 [240 Cal.Rptr. 569, 742 P.2d 1290].)

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed by real party in interest Legislature of the State of California is denied.


Summaries of

Whatley-Miller v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.
Feb 6, 2013
213 Cal.App.4th 544 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Whatley-Miller v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:SUSANNE WHATLEY-MILLER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COLLIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

213 Cal.App.4th 544 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)