From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whalley v. Citibank (In re Whalley)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 12-38962 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-38962 Adv No. 12-01875

02-06-2013

In re: Daniel A Whalley and Viviana A Aspera Debtors Daniel A Whalley and Viviana A Aspera Plaintiffs v. Citibank Defendant

Jonathan D. Parker Attorneys for Plaintiffs Geraci Law LLC


Hon. Jack B. Schmetterer


Chapter 13


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Pursuant to a Default Order and because the allegations in the Complaint have been taken as confessed against Citibank, the following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made and will be entered:

1. Plaintiffs are individuals residing at 4905 S. Karlov Ave., Chicago, IL 60632.

2. Citibank is a lender and/or servicer of mortgages.

3. Plaintiffs filed for relief under chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on 09/29/2012 in the Northern District of Illinois, case number 12-38962.

4. This adversary proceeding arises under sections 502 and 506 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

5. This Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 151, 157 and 1334 and this is a core proceeding under 28. U.S.C. § 157.

6. Plaintiffs are the owners of real estate located at 4905 S. Karlov Ave., Chicago, IL 60632 described as follows:

Common Address: 4905 S. Karlov Ave., Chicago, IL 60632
Parcel ID #: 19-10-222-002-0000

7. The fair market value of the real estate is $195,000 pursuant to Exhibit A to the original adversary complaint.

8. A first mortgage lien is currently held by Citibank in the amount of $240,387.82 pursuant to Exhibit B to the original adversary complaint.

9. Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 506(a) and 506(d), Defendant's junior mortgage would be allowed a secured claim to the extent of the value of the estate's interest in the property securing the claim, and Defendant's lien is void to the extent it is not allowed a secured claim.

10. The amount owed on the first mortgage, $240,387.82, exceeds the value of the above real estate, $195,000.

11. Due to the junior mortgage lien, which is held by Defendant, being wholly unsecured, it should not be allowed as a secured claim, and the mortgage may be stripped off. See, Holloway v. U.S., 2001 WL 1249053 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 16, 2001); In re Waters, 276 B.R. 879 (N.D. Ill 2002); In re Pond, 252 F.3d 122 (2nd Cir. 2001); In re McDonald, 205 F.3d 606 (3rd Cir. 2000); In Re Bartee, 212 F.3d 277 (5th Cir. 2000); In Re Lane, 280 F.3d 663 (6th Cir. 2002); In re Zimmer, 313 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Tannter, 217 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2000).

Signed: _______________

Jack B. Schmetterer
Prepared by:
Jonathan D. Parker
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Geraci Law LLC


Summaries of

Whalley v. Citibank (In re Whalley)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2013
Case No. 12-38962 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Whalley v. Citibank (In re Whalley)

Case Details

Full title:In re: Daniel A Whalley and Viviana A Aspera Debtors Daniel A Whalley and…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-38962 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Wormley v. Wormley

There, if the Court sees, that without manifest injustice to the parties before it, or to others, it can…

Stearns v. Page

But where a fraud appears in a stated account, the whole will be opened, though of a great many years'…