Summary
In Whalen v. Pension Commission, c., 7 N.J. Mis. R. 964, it was held: "There is no percentage or sum of money that the statute either directs shall be deducted from his pay or that he himself shall voluntarily contribute, and it is only by interpreting the word `salary' as meaning also the word `pension' that any sum whatever can be realized for the pension fund from the pensioner.
Summary of this case from Burns v. Police Fire Pension CommissionOpinion
Argued February 4, 1930 —
Decided May 19, 1930.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 7 N.J. Mis. R. 964.
For the respondent, Isadore Sacks.
For the appellant, Harcourt Steelman.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.