No. 113533.
August 31, 1999.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 30, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Court of Appeals No. 202570.
Full title:DONALD and GLORIA WETZEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONSUMERS POWER…
Court:Supreme Court of Michigan
Date published: Aug 31, 1999
In an action such as this, i.e., an action in conversion, [1] in order to prevail, the plaintiff must show…
Englehart v. SageRespondent submits that the sheriff having converted the money in the manner alleged and proved, he is…