Summary
construing the phrase "arising out of" to mean "originating from," "growing out of," or having a "substantial nexus."
Summary of this case from Decoration Design Sols. v. Amcor Rigid Plastic U.S., Inc.Opinion
Argued May 20, 1974 —
Decided May 29, 1974.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Richard D. Catenacci, argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, ( McElroy, Connell, Foley Geiser, attorneys).
Mr. William M. Lake, argued the cause for appellant Continental Insurance Company, ( Dietrich, Stockman Lake, attorneys).
Mr. Gerald Kaplan, argued the cause for respondent Motor Club Fire Casualty Co., and Eisner, etc., ( Lieb, Teich Berlin, attorneys; Jerome S. Lieb on the brief).
Mr. Edward B. Meredith, argued the cause for respondents Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Holcombe, ( Meredith, Meredith Chase, attorneys).
Mr. Gregory V. Hopkins argued the cause for respondents Potent, ( Frank V. Walsh, Jr., attorney).
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Hallie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N.J. Super.
For reversal — None.
For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and PASHMAN — 5.