From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Sconyers

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 22, 2010
CASE NO. 2:08-cv-082-MEF (M.D. Ala. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-082-MEF.

November 22, 2010


ORDER


On November 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #43) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment on plaintiff's excessive force claim (Doc. #26, #31) are DENIED.

3. The plaintiff's § 1983 excessive force claim will be set for trial by jury.

DONE this the 22nd day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

West v. Sconyers

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 22, 2010
CASE NO. 2:08-cv-082-MEF (M.D. Ala. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

West v. Sconyers

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROBERT WEST, JR., #110315, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN SCONYERS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-082-MEF (M.D. Ala. Nov. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Demings

Moreover, an inmate "is not at liberty to ignore or disobey, without consequence, the lawful orders of his…

Crandle v. Sims

(Doc. 1 at 4). The law states that "[s]trict adherence to rules and orders within a penal institution's walls…